K Rudramuni v. O Hemanna
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against acquittal in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 NI Act was dismissed for non-prosecution: appellant absent despite notice, counsel retired from the case.
What the court decided
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:36111 CRL.A No. 1138 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1138 OF 2013
BETWEEN:
K. RUDRAMUNI, S/O KALADI KARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, #64, 4TH MAIN, 1ST PHASE, MANJUNATHA NAGAR, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BANGALORE 560 010
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. RAJAKUMAR C., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by YAMUNA K L Location: High Court of Karnataka
O. HEMANNA, S/O LATE OBLAPPA, 3RD CROSS, RAJENDRA NAGARA, JOGIMATTI ROAD, CHITRADURGA 577 522
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K. Rudramuni
- respondent
O. Hemanna
Coram
M G Uma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.A/1138/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court