Disposed

Sri.Gopalappa T.K. v. Sri.Ravikumar Yadav

Karnataka HC26 Sept 2024CCC/829/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt complaint alleging violation of a single judge's order in a writ petition. The complainant disputed the factum of compliance but sought liberty on merits. The Division Bench reserved liberty to file independent proceedings challenging the authority's action and disposed of the petition without expressing any opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Liberty reserved to the complainant to pursue independent proceedings challenging the respondent-authority's action; contempt petition disposed of.

Sri.Gopalappa T.K. Vs Sri.Ravikumar Yadav — Contempt of Court | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:40575-DB CCC No. 829 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 26^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶7

AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

¶9

CCC NO. 829 OF 2024 (CIVIL)

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

SRI.GOPALAPPA T.K. S/O LATE G.C.KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT NO.314, CHOWDAPPA LAYOUT, 3^RD STAGE, THANISANDRA, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 045.

¶12

Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

…COMPLAINANT

¶14

(BY SRI. K.R. RAMESH., ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

SRI.RAVIKUMAR YADAV FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE COMPLAINANT THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, K.R. PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 036.

¶17

¶18

NC: 2024:KHC:40575-DB CCC No. 829 of 2024

¶19

STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶20

…ACCUSED

¶21

(BY SMT. PRAMODHINI KISHAN., AGA)

¶22

CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING COMMITTED THE CONTEMPT OF THE ORDER DATED 24.11.2023 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HONBLE COURT IN W.P.NO.15620/2023 AT ANNEXURE-D AND DEAL WITH THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW FOR HAVING COMMITTED SUCH ACTS

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

¶25

¶26

NC: 2024:KHC:40575-DB CCC No. 829 of 2024

¶27

ORAL ORDER

¶28

(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA)

¶29

While learned advocate Mr. K.R. Ramesh for the complainant is disputing the factum of compliance and submitted that liberty may be reserved to challenge the decision of the respondent-authority since the complainant is aggrieved on merits.

¶30

Such liberty is reserved. The complainant may file appropriate independent proceedings, if so advised, challenging the action part of the respondent. The Court, however, does not express any opinion on merits in that regard.

¶31

The present petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶32

Sd/(N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE

¶33

Sd/(K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE

¶34

¶35

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39

Sri.Gopalappa T.K. v. Sri.Ravikumar Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri.Gopalappa T.K. v. Sri.Ravikumar Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Kumar Vs T Manjunath

M/S Eds Agro India Private Limited Vs Icici Bank Ltd.

Sri M D Ashoka Vs Sri Prasanna Kumar

Sri. a. B. Ganapathy Vs Smt. Apparanda Shanthi Bopanna

Sri R Rangaswamy Vs Sri Pramod L Patil (K a S)

Kum Suvarna N a Vs Sri P Manivanna