Disposed

J Prakash v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC10 Nov 2023WP/7401/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition under Article 226 sought a direction to the respondent Thasildar to consider multiple representations for mutuating the petitioners' family name in mutation registers. The High Court directed the respondent to consider the representations within three months.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No. 2 directed to consider representations dated 25.9.2020, 08.11.2021, 15.2.2022, and 23.1.2023 within three months.

J Prakash Vs State of Karnataka — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2023:KHC:40385 WP NO.7401 OF 2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.7401 OF 2023 (KLR-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

J. PRAKASH S/O LATE DODDAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT BYREGOWDANAHALLI COLONY, MALARABANAWADI, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK.

¶9

D. KUMAR S/O LATE JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO.13, 1^ST MAIN, 1^ST CROSS, KANTEERAVA NAGAR, NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 096.

¶10

…PETITIONERS

¶11

Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶12

(BY SRI. SHIVARAMU H.C., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶15

THE THASILDAR, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 001

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SRI. C.N. MAHADESHWARAN, AGA)

¶18

¶19

NC: 2023:KHC:40385 WP NO.7401 OF 2023

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 25^TH SEPTEMBER, 2020, 08^TH NOVEMBER, 2021, 15^TH FEBRUARY, 2022 AND 23^RD JANUARY, 2023 VIDE ANNEXURES 'B', 'B1', 'B2' AND 'B3' RESPECTIVELY FOR MUTATING THE NAME OF THE PETITIONERS FAMILY IN THE REVENUE RECORDS AND ISSUE COPY OF THE MUTATION EXTRACT AND RTC IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS FORTHWITH IN TERMS OF THE GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION DATED 29^TH SEPTEMBER, 2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-C; AND ETC.

¶21

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

In this writ petition, petitioners have sought for a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider the representations to make IHC proceedings in respect of change of entry insofar as Mutation Register is concerned.

¶24

Heard Sri. Shivaramu H.C., learned counsel appearing for petitioners and Sri. C.N. Mahadeshwaran, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents.

¶25

Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representations

¶26

¶27

NC: 2023:KHC:40385 WP NO.7401 OF 2023

¶28

dated 25^th September, 2020 (Annexure-B), 08^th November, 2021 (Annexure-B1), 15^th February, 2022 (Annexure-B2) and 23^rd January, 2023 (Annexure-B3) in accordance with law,

¶29

within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of.

¶30

SD/JUDGE

¶31

ARK

J Prakash v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J Prakash v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopalappa Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Sriram Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri S Vishwanath @ Gundappa Vs the Tahsildar

Sri. Prakash Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. H. S. Kantharaju Vs the State of Karnataka

Mr. Arif. K Vs the Tahashildar