Sri Hanumanthappa v. the Deputy Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the High Court of Karnataka permitted the petitioner to make one more representation to the competent authority within four weeks. The Court directed the respondents to consider correspondence between Revenue and Forest authorities while disposing off the petition without expressing an opinion on merits.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner permitted to make one more representation; respondents directed to consider Revenue and Forest department correspondence.