Disposed

Siddaiah B R v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC2 Nov 2023WP/5146/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking recovery of scheduled land and restoration of a graveyard. They subsequently filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the petition due to hostility from villagers. The court granted leave for withdrawal and disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the writ petition was granted; writ petition disposed off as withdrawn.

Siddaiah B R Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

1 - NC: 2023:KHC:38725-DB WP No. 5146 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 5146 OF 2023 (KLR-RES)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SIDDAIAH B R, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, KAREKATTE VILLAGE,

¶11

DAVANGERE TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT 577 002. EMAIL:[email protected] PAN:DOES NOT POSSESS A PAN CARD

¶12

SHIVALINGAPPA K N,

¶13

Digitally signed by SHARADA VANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, KAREKATTE VILLAGE, DAVANGERE TALUK,

¶15

DAVANGERE DISTRICT 577 002. EMAIL: [email protected] PAN: ETGPK7536A SENIOR CITIZENSHIP BENEFIT IS NOT CLAIMED

¶16

H B PATEL

¶17

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, KAREKATTE VILLAGE, DAVANGERE TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT 577 002. EMAIL:[email protected] PAN:CLFPP2309P

¶18

…PETITIONERS

¶19

2 - NC: 2023:KHC:38725-DB WP No. 5146 of 2023

¶20

(BY SRI. RAVI H K.,ADVOCATE)

¶21

AND:

¶22

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGLAURU 560 001.

¶23

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DAVANGERE DISTRICT, DAVANGERE 577 004.

¶24

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHENNAGIRI TALUKU, AVANGERE DISTRICT -577 213. DAVANGERE 577 002.

¶25

TAHSILDAR, CHENNAGIRI TALUKU, DAVANGERE DISTRICT, DAVANGERE 577 004.

¶26

THE SECRETARY, KAREKATTE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, CHENNAGIRI TALUKU, DAVANGERE DISTRICT 577 213.

¶27

SMT. SHANTHAMMA WIFE OF LATE B RUDRAPPA @ SANNA RUDRAPA, MAJOR, R/AT KAREKATTE VILLAGE, SANTHEBENNUR HOBLI, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT - 577 545.

¶28

RUDRESH B R SON OF LATE B RUDRAPPA @ SANNA RUDRAPA, MAJOR, R/AT KAREKATTE VILLAGE,

¶29

3 - NC: 2023:KHC:38725-DB WP No. 5146 of 2023

¶30

SANTHEBENNUR HOBLI, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT - 577 545.

¶31

SMT. LAKSHMI DEVI DAUGHTER OF LATE B RUDRAPPA @ SANNA RUDRAPA, MAJOR, R/AT KAREKATTE VILLAGE, SANTHEBENNUR HOBLI, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT - 577 545.

¶32

SMT. LATHA DAUGHTER OF LATE B RUDRAPPA @ SANNA RUDRAPA, MAJOR, R/AT KAREKATTE VILLAGE, SANTHEBENNUR HOBLI, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT - 577 545.

¶33

NAGARAJA SON OF LATE B RUDRAPPA @ SANNA RUDRAPA, MAJOR, R/AT KAREKATTE VILLAGE, SANTHEBENNUR HOBLI, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT - 577 545.

¶34

…RESPONDENTS

¶35

(BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR., AGA FOR R1 TO R4; MS.ASHIKA G., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. P M SIDDAMALLAPPA., ADVOCATE FOR R6 TO R10)

¶36

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS WRIT PETITION BY GRANTING THE FOLLOWING RELIEFS i) DIRECT THE RESPONDENT-1 TO 5 RECOVER THE

¶37

4 - NC: 2023:KHC:38725-DB WP No. 5146 of 2023

¶38

SCHEDULE LAND FROM RESPONDENT NOS.6 TO 10 AND RESTORE AND PROTECT THE GRAVE YARD ON THE SCHEDULE LAND BY FENCING THE SAME BY ISSUING WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND ii) GRANT SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER RELIEFS.

¶39

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶40

ORDER

¶41

Learned counsel for the petitioners have filed Memo dated 25.10.2023 in the court seeking leave to withdraw

¶42

the writ petition. The said memo reads as under:

¶43

“The petitioners most respectfully submit as hereunder:

¶44

It is submitted that subsequent to filing of this writ petition unfortunately, the petitioners and their family members have been facing ire and hostility of the villagers for having undertaken this litigation although the same is undertaken for a public cause. As a result, the petitioners are facing difficulties in leading a normal life on a day to day basis. Hence, the petitioners, seek the leave of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw this petition in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶45

¶46

NC: 2023:KHC:38725-DB WP No. 5146 of 2023

¶47

Accordingly at the request of counsel for the petitioners, leave for withdrawal is granted and Writ Petition is disposed off as having been withdrawn.

Sd/CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

JUDGE

Snb/

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1

Siddaiah B R v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Siddaiah B R v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Karnataka Vs the Karnataka State Taluk Mojini Operators

Sri H Rajappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Islamia Institute of Techonology Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Shobha Aiyanna Vs Sri.Tushar Girinath

Sri Girisha M S Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Puttegowda Vs Sri. S. R. Umashankar