Writ petition filed by minorities regarding temple management committee formation dismissed on the ground that the petition was withdrawn by petitioner advocates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:13194 WP No. 103539 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
WRIT PETITION NO. 103539 OF 2023 (GM-R/C)
BETWEEN:
ROHAN HADIMANI T Digitally signed by ROHAN HADIMANI T
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI N.L. BATAKURKI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI PRAVEEN UPPAR, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR APPROPRIATE DIRECTION OR ORDER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 HEREIN TO CONSIDER REPRESENTATION AT ANNEXURE-A AND B AND APPOINT OR FROM A MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE TO HANUMAN TEMPLE (ANJANEYSWAMI) TULASIGERI VILLAGE OF BAGALKOT DISTRICT ACCORDING TO SEC 25 OF THE KARNATAKA HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS ACT 2012 IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Advocate for the petitioners submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
His submission is placed on record. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Registry is directed to return back the original documents to the petitioners after due verification and after keeping a photocopy of the same for record purposes.
Sd/JUDGE
RSH / Ct-mck
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10
Chandrashekhar
Iranna
Vithal
Hanmant
Narayana
Nagesh
M.I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
