Chaluvegowda v. Smt. Mahadevamma
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed due to non-prosecution and failure to comply with three sets of court objections after three years.
Appeal dismissed due to non-prosecution and failure to comply with three sets of court objections after three years.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA No. 770 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.770 OF 2020 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
CHALUVEGOWDA S/O LATE THOTLEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT GALIGARA HUNDI VILLAGE, RAMMANAHALLI POST, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 130.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SANATH KUMARA K M., ADVOCATE[ABSENT])
AND:
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R/AT GALIGARA HUNDI VILLAGE,
RAMMANAHALLI POST, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 130.
RSA No. 770 of 2020
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS No.2&4 ARE R/AT RAGIMUDDANAHALLI VILLAGE, GUNGADARUMALE POST, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 224.
RESPONDENTS No.3 TO 4 ARE R/AT DOOR NO 480, GUTHALU VILLAGE, MANDYA MALAVALLI ROAD, NEAR GOVT PRIMARY SCHOOL, MANDYA - 571 401.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CPC., SEEKING CERTAIN RELEIFS.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
When the matter is called, there is no representation on
behalf of appellant.
The captioned appeal is listed today for orders regarding
non-compliance of office objections for third time.
RSA No. 770 of 2020
As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2020. Now we are in the month of May 2023. It's been three years. So far, office objections are not complied with.
It appears that the appellant has not instructed the counsel on record to comply office objections and appellant is not diligent in prosecuting the appeal.
As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of appellant. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
NR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16
Chaluviegowda S/o Late Thotlegowda
Smt. Mahadevamma W/o Chikkegowda
Putta S/o Late Kempalingaiah
Shivanna S/o Late Kempalingaiah
Jayaram S/o Late Kempalingaiah
Shivanna S/o Late Ningaiah
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court