This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of CPC was dismissed for non-prosecution. The Court observed that the appellant had no representation and the appeal was pending for four years.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA No. 219 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.219 OF 2019 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SATHYANARAYAN SINGH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O LATE HEERA SINGH, R/AT D.218, DEWANS ROAD, CHAMARAJA MOHALLA, MYSURU - 570 024. …APPELLANT
[(BY SRI. ABHINAV R., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]
AND:
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RSA No. 219 of 2019
RSA No. 219 of 2019
ALL RESPONDENTS ARE R/AT D.NO.4705, 2ND CROSS, SHIVAJI ROAD, N.R. MOHALLA MYSURU CITY - 570 007.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of appellant.
As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2019. Now we are in the month of May 2023. The appeal is pending since four years. It appears that the appellant is not diligent in prosecuting the appeal.
RSA No. 219 of 2019
As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
NR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the regular second appeal should be disposed of due to non-prosecution by the appellant.
Sri. Sathyanarayana Singh
Smt. Madamma
Smt. Chikkamma
Sri Girish
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
