Disposed

Ramachandra K v. Ramutha

Karnataka HC14 Jun 2023MFA/513/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court Lok Adalat settled a miscellaneous first appeal against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award. The court recorded a settlement wherein the appellant agreed to a lump sum of Rs. 85,000/- additional to the tribunal award, and the dispute is disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Modification of the Tribunal's Judgment and Award to include an additional lump sum payment of Rs. 85,000/- as settled.

Ramachandra K Vs Ramutha — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 14^TH DAY OF JUNE 2023

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. JOSHI

¶7

¶8

SRI. R.P. D’SOUZA, MEMBER

¶9

M.F.A.No. 513/2023 (MV)

¶10

(Lok Adalat No.1553/2023)

¶11

BETWEEN

¶12

Ramachandra K. S/o Late Kempananaiah, Aged about 63 years, 815, 13^th Main Road, T.K. Extension, Saraswathipuram, Mysuru -570 009.

¶13

... APPELLANT

¶14

(BY SRI. SYED ABDUL SABOOR, ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND

¶16

1 . Ramutha S/o Ghansham, Aged about 43 years, R/at 4/174, 1^st Cross, J.P. Nagara, Mysuru– 570 008.

¶17

The Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Adichunchanagiri Road, Srinivasa Complex, Kuvempunagara, Mysuru-570 004. …RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SRI. A.M. VENKATESH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)

¶19

¶20

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 29.11.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO. 1462/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE AND MACT, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶21

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶22

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶23

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present.

¶24

The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

¶25

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. The appellant -

¶26

claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.85,000/- (Rupees Eighty Five Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. We are satisfied that the settlement is just proper and is in the interest of justice and equity. Therefore, the joint memo is accepted.

¶27

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶28

¶29

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of

¶30

the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.

¶31

A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent - Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed.

¶32

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

¶33

Memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶34

Sd/JUDGE

¶35

Sd/MEMBER

¶36

Rbv

Ramachandra K v. Ramutha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramachandra K v. Ramutha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagaveni Vs Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Murthy K K Vs Lakshmi M.

Gangadharaiah. S. N. Vs Jagadish

Manjunatha Vs T.L Prakash Kumar

Paramesh @ Prathap .G.R. Vs Raghuveer

Sri Mahadeva Vs Sri Chandrashekar B N