Allowed

Paramesh @ Prathap .G.R. v. Raghuveer

Karnataka HC14 Jun 2023MFA/1476/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a Lok Adalat order concerning a Miscellaneous First Appeal filed for enhancement of compensation in a motor vehicle accident case involving the High Court of Karnataka. After negotiations, the dispute was settled with the insurance company agreeing to a lump-sum payment of Rs. 50,000/- in addition to the Tribunal's award.

What did the court decide?

Insurance Company to pay a lump sum of Rs. 50,000/- in addition to the Tribunal's award within six weeks, with interest at 9% p.a. from date of default.

Paramesh @ Prathap .G.R. Vs Raghuveer — Insurance | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 14^TH DAY OF JUNE 2023

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. JOSHI

¶7

¶8

SRI. R.P. D’SOUZA, MEMBER

¶9

M.F.A.No. 1476/2022 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.1561/2023)

¶10

BETWEEN

¶11

Paramesh @ Prathap G.R. S/o Raghuveer, Aged about 18 years, R/at A. Guduganahalli Village, Shanthigrama Hobli, Hassan Taluk-573 201, Hassan District.

¶12

... APPELLANT

¶13

(BY SRI. JAGADEESH H.T., ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND

¶15

1 . Raghuveer S/o Late Malegowda, Major, Guduganahalli Village, Shanthigrama Hobli, Hassan Taluk-573 201.

¶16

Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd., 1^st Floor, Manjunath Complex,

¶17

¶18

Old Bus Stand Road, Hassan Town, Hassan – 573 201. …RESPONDENTS

¶19

(BY SRI. C. SHANKARA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)

¶20

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 30.12.2019 PASSED IN MVC NO. 1552/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE 2^ND ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MEMBER, MACT, HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶21

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶22

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶23

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present.

¶24

The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

¶25

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. The appellant - claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. We are satisfied that the settlement is just proper and is in the interest of justice and equity. Therefore, the joint memo is accepted.

¶26

¶27

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶28

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant – claimant, on proper identification.

¶29

A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent - Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed.

¶30

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶31

Sd/JUDGE

¶32

Sd/MEMBER

¶33

Rbv

Paramesh @ Prathap .G.R. v. Raghuveer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paramesh @ Prathap .G.R. v. Raghuveer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagaveni Vs Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Murthy K K Vs Lakshmi M.

Gangadharaiah. S. N. Vs Jagadish

Manjunatha Vs T.L Prakash Kumar

Sri Mahadeva Vs Sri Chandrashekar B N

Smt Manjula Vs Sri Puneeth v N