Disposed

Murthy K K v. Lakshmi M.

Karnataka HC6 Jun 2023MFA/5546/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Lok Adalat proceeding, the High Court judges settled a motor accident compensation appeal. The respondent insurance company agreed to pay an enhanced lump sum of Rs. 1,25,000/- as full and final settlement, to be deposited with interest within six weeks. The appeal was disposed of based on this settlement.

What did the court decide?

Settled for Rs. 1,25,000/- lump sum + Tribunal award to be deposited within 6 weeks with 9% interest on default; appeal disposed of.

Murthy K K Vs Lakshmi M. — Insurance | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF JUNE 2023

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR &

¶7

MS. M.R. RASHMI, MEMBER

¶8

M.F.A.No. 5546/2015 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 1217/2023)

¶9

BETWEEN

¶10

Murthy K.K. S/o Krishnappa, Aged about 43 years, R/o Dargapura Ward No.8, Doddaballapura,

¶11

Bangalore Rural District-571 438.

¶12

...APPELLANT

¶13

(By Sri. R. Pramod, Advocate)

¶14

AND

¶15

1 . Lakshmi M. W/o D. Veeranna, R/o Vittalnagara, Challakere Town, Chitradurga District-571 428.

¶16

The Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., New Muslim Hostel Complex, Saraswathipuram Main Road, Mysore – 571 408. RESPONDENTS

¶17

(By Sri. : Janardhan Reddy, Advocate for R-2, Notice to R-1 – d/w v.c.o. dated 31.07.2021)

¶18

¶19

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 02.02.2015 PASSED IN MVC NO. 585/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & MACT, MALAVALLI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶20

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶21

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶22

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present.

¶23

The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent –Insurance Company and along with its representative are present.

¶24

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs. 1,25,000/- (Rupees One Lakh

¶25

Twenty Five Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

¶26

¶27

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶28

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.

¶29

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶30

Sd/-

¶31

JUDGE

¶32

Sd/MEMBER

¶33

Rbv

Murthy K K v. Lakshmi M.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murthy K K v. Lakshmi M.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gangadharaiah. S. N. Vs Jagadish

Smt H Anitha Vs Smt B M Radhamma

Smt Varalakshmi T K Vs Sri Ramakrishna

Nagaveni Vs Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Manjunatha Vs T.L Prakash Kumar

Paramesh @ Prathap .G.R. Vs Raghuveer