Disposed

Smt Shanthamma v. M/S Att Logistics Private Ltd.

Karnataka HC27 Jun 2023MFA/5030/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A High Court Lok Adalat settled a miscellaneous first appeal regarding compensation for a motor accident. The parties agreed to a sum of Rs. 14.20 lakhs via demand draft, disposing of the appeal and modifying the prior tribunal award.

What did the court decide?

Amount of Rs. 14,20,000/- settled via Demand Draft No.432985 dated 22.06.2023; Appeal disposed; Tribunal Award modified.

Smt Shanthamma Vs M/S Att Logistics Private Ltd. — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 27^TH DAY OF JUNE 2023

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR &

¶7

MS. M.R. RASHMI, MEMBER

¶8

M.F.A.No. 5030/2020 (MV)

¶9

(Lok Adalat No. 1603/2023)

¶10

BETWEEN

¶11

SMT SHANTHAMMA W/O LATE HANUMANTHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.

¶12

SRI AMITH

¶13

S/O LATE HANUMANTHEGOWDA

¶14

AGE ABOUT 18 YEARS.

¶15

KUMARI AKSHITHA

¶16

D/O LATE HANUMANTHEGOWDA

¶17

APPELLANT NO.3 IS MINOR REP BY HER MOTHER NATURAL GUARDIAN APPELLANT NO.1 SMT SHANTHAMMA.

¶18

APPELLANTS NO.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT VADERAHALLI KASABA HOBLI,

¶19

¶20

MADHUGIRI TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT.

¶21

SRI LAKSHMINARASAPPA S/O NARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS.

¶22

SMT SAKAMMA W/O LASKHMINARASAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS.

¶23

APPELLANTS NO.4 AND 5 ARE RESIDING AT KRISHNAPURA MEDIGESHI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572101.

¶24

...Appellants

¶25

(By Sri. SATHISHA T, ADVOCATE)

¶26

AND

¶27

M/S ATT LOGISTICS PRIVATE LTD. K R S GARDEN, MVJ ENGINEERING COLLEGE ROAD HOFE FORM WHITE FIELD BANGALORE - 560066 OWNER OF CAR BEARING REG NO KA- 53-A-1195

¶28

2 . ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NO 114 VEER SAVARKAR MARG NEAR SIDDHI VINAYAK TEMPLE PRABHADEVI, MUMBAI - 400025 SERVICE ADDRESS ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL

¶29

¶30

INSURANCE CO LTD 2ND FLOOR, PRAJA PRAGATHI BUILDING B H ROAD, TUMKUR NOW REP BY ICICI LOMBARD GEN INSURANCE CO LTD NO 121 ESTATE BUILDING 9TH FLOOR DICKENSON ROAD M G ROAD BENGALURU – 560001.

¶31

…Respondents (By Smt. ASHA D HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE FOR R-1, SRI. B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)

¶32

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 08.07.2020 PASSED IN MVC NO. 129/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT, MADHUGIRI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶33

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶34

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶35

The appellants – claimants and respondent No.1 – owner and their

¶36

respective learned Counsel are present.

¶37

The learned Counsel appearing for both appellants and owner have

¶38

filed a joint memo with their signature and their respective Advocates

¶39

¶40

stating that the matter is settled in the Lok Adalat. Conciliation is held. Accordingly, both the appellants – claimants and respondent – owner have agreed to settle the matter for a sum of Rs.14,20,000/- (Rupees Fourteen Lakhs Twenty Thousand only). It is agreed that the owner of the offending vehicle shall pay compensation to the claimants by way of Demand Draft bearing No.432985 dated 22.06.2023 drawn on Union Bank of India and accordingly, the owner has issued the said Demand Draft to the claimants and the claimants have acknowledged the receipt of the said Demand Draft as full and final settlement towards the dispute. In respect of the demand draft, both the claimants and the owner of the vehicle have affixed their signature on the Order Sheet along with their Advocates.

¶41

Accordingly, this Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶42

Sd/JUDGE

¶43

Sd/MEMBER

¶44

Rbv

Smt Shanthamma v. M/S Att Logistics Private Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Shanthamma v. M/S Att Logistics Private Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayalaxmi Vs Deepak K a

Smt Shaik Kaligar Shahin Taj Vs Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd.

Smt. Savithramma Vs Sri. Bairaji

Aslam @ Aslam Pasha Vs Shriram General Ins. Co. Ltd.

Smt Durgamma Vs M/S Att Logistics Private Limited

Smt Yallamma Vs M/S Att Logistics Private Limited