Disposed

Jayalaxmi v. Deepak K a

Karnataka HC20 Jun 2023MFA/7742/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court Legal Services Committee, Bengaluru, constituted a Lok Adalat to conciliate M.F.A. No. 7742/2022. After prolonged negotiations, the parties executed a joint memo settling the claim for a lump-sum of Rs. 22,70,000 with interest provisions. The appellate proceedings stood disposed of based on this settlement.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was disposed of as settled; the Insurance Company agreed to pay a lump sum of Rs. 22,70,000 with interest; the Tribunal Award was modified accordingly.

Jayalaxmi Vs Deepak K a — Insurance | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 20^TH DAY OF JUNE 2023

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

¶7

¶8

MS. M.R. RASHMI, MEMBER

¶9

M.F.A.No. 7742/2022 (MV)

¶10

(Lok Adalat No. 2268/2023)

¶11

BETWEEN

¶12

Jayalaxmi

¶13

Now Aged 48 years, W/o Late Radhakrishna Gowda.

¶14

Karthik.

¶15

Now aged 21 years, S/o Late Radhakrishna Gowda.

¶16

Srikanth,

¶17

Now aged 17 years, S/o Late Radhakrishna Gowda.

¶18

Appellant No.3 is minor rep. by his Natural guardian mother Jayalaxmi/Appellant No.1.

¶19

All are R/o 3-227(1), Bellichadavu House, Ishwaramangala Post, Nettanigemudnoor Village,

¶20

¶21

Puttur Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District-574 201. ...APPELLANTS

¶22

(By Sri. K. Vishwanatha Poojary, Advocate)

¶23

AND

¶24

Deepak K.A. Now aged 30 years, S/o Anni Poojary, R/o Kodi Hosamane House, Aryapu Village, Puttur Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District-574 201.

¶25

The Manager, Sriram General Insurance Co. Ltd., E-8, RIICO Industrial Area, Sita Pura – Jaipur, Rajasthan – 302 022. RESPONDENTS

¶26

(By Sri. B. Pradeep, Advocate for R-2)

¶27

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 15.09.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO. 651/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC & MEMBER, MACT, PUTTUR, D.K., PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶28

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶29

¶30

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶31

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

¶32

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondentInsurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs. 22,70,000/- (Rupees Twenty Two Lakhs Seventy Thousand only), including the compensation awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

¶33

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶34

¶35

The apportionment, deposit and release of the modified compensation

¶36

amount shall be made in terms of the Judgment and Award passed by the Claims Tribunal.

¶37

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶38

Sd/JUDGE

¶39

Sd/MEMBER

¶40

Rbv

Jayalaxmi v. Deepak K a

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayalaxmi v. Deepak K a

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abrar Pasha Vs Manthan Rai K

Smt. Naryanamma Vs Mrs. Mamatha

Sri Karthik Vs Sri Raghu Vuduta

Smt Shaik Kaligar Shahin Taj Vs Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd.

Smt. Savithramma Vs Sri. Bairaji

The Manager Vs Nagaraj A.G. Dead by Lrs