Dismissed

Smt Lakshminarasamma v. Sri Narasimha Murthy

Karnataka HC6 Dec 2023CRP/46/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 CPC against an order rejecting I.A. dated 26.07.2022. The Court granted two weeks time to complete office objections. Subsequently, a note order dated 27.02.2024 stated that since the office objections were not complied with as per the Court Order dated 06.12.2023, the petition shall stand dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed due to non-compliance of office objections noted vide registration entry on 27.02.2024.

Smt Lakshminarasamma Vs Sri Narasimha Murthy — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 06^TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023

¶2

BEFORE

¶3

THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ

¶4

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 46 OF 2023

¶5

BETWEEN

¶6

SMT LAKSHMINARASAMMA

¶7

W/O LATE Y.T. ASWATHAPPA

¶8

AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS

¶9

2 . SRI RAJESH

¶10

S/O LATE Y.T. ASWATHAPPA

¶11

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶12

3 . SMT. VEENA

¶13

D/O LATE Y.T. ASWATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

¶14

4 . SMT. SUNITHA

¶15

D/O LATE Y.T. ASWATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

¶16

ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO 8 3^RD CROSS SAPTHAGIRI TOWER

¶17

BUILDING CHIKKA ADIGODI

…2

CRP NO. 46/2023

MALAVALA POST

BENGALURU 560029

5 . SMT LEELAMMA

¶24

D/O LATE Y.T. ASWATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT KADALAVENI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI

¶25

GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK

¶26

6 . SMT SUGUNA

¶27

D/O LATE Y.T. ASWATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RESIDING AT OLD KEB MARUTHI NAGAR GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK

¶28

... PETITIONER/S

¶29

(By Sri. : GIRISHA T.R., ADVOCATE)

¶30

AND

¶31

1 . SRI NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RESIDING AT VYCHAKURAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI

GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK

…3

CRP NO. 46/2023

2 . SRI RAMA REDDY

¶37

S/O CHIKKA GANGANNA

¶38

AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDING AT KADALAVENI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI

¶39

GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK ... RESPONDENT/S

¶40

CIVIL REVISION PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 26.07.2022 PASSED ON I.A. IN OS.NO.292/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GOWRIBIDANUR. REJECTING THE I.A. FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11 (a) AND (d) OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT.

¶41

This Civil Revision Petition coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order.

¶42

ORDER

¶43

Two weeks time is granted to do the needful, failing which, the petition shall stand dismissed without reference to Bench.

Sd/JUDGE

…4

CRP NO. 46/2023

NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 06.12.2023, office objections are not

¶49

complied with, hence petition shall stand dismissed.

¶50

COPY

¶51

Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶52

T By : SR R By : RG C By : VS Ty Dt : 27.02.2024 C.Dt : 02.03.2024

Smt Lakshminarasamma v. Sri Narasimha Murthy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Lakshminarasamma v. Sri Narasimha Murthy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K L Ravindranatha Reddy Vs Smt Deveeramma K N

Shivanand N Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt.Rathnamma Vs Smt.Kempamma

Smt. Ashritha @ Arshitha Vs Panchayathi Development Officer

Smt. Gajalakshmi N Vs N. Nagaraj

Mr.Jayanth Vs Tisha