Dismissed

Smt. Ashritha @ Arshitha v. Panchayathi Development Officer

Karnataka HC6 Dec 2023CRP/719/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner withdrew Civil Revision Petition under Sec. 115 CPC against order allowing rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) read with Sec. 10-A, Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act 2020. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the revision petition allowed; liberty to file appeal granted; limitation period calculated excluding time consumed.

Smt. Ashritha @ Arshitha Vs Panchayathi Development Officer — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

1 - NC: 2023:KHC:44153 CRP No. 719 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 719 OF 2023 (IO)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT. ASHRITHA @ ARSHITHA, W/O KIRAN, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, D/O LATE JAYANNA, R/AT MAGADI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SAKALESHPURA TALUK - 573 127.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SMT. H.C. LOKESHWARI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAVISHANKAR. A, ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

PANCHAYATHI DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, HALASULEGE VILLAGE PANCHAYATHI, KASABA HOBLI, SAKALESHPURA TALUK - 573 127.

¶13

THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUK PANCHAYATHI, SAKALESHPURA TOWN - 573 127.

¶14

…RESPONDENTS

¶15

THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST

¶16

THE ORDER DATED 10.08.2023 PASSED ON IA NO.V IN OS NO.31/2021 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAKALESHPURA., ALLOWING THE IA NO.V FILED UNDER

¶17

¶18

NC: 2023:KHC:44153 CRP No. 719 of 2023

¶19

ORDER VII RULE 11(d) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC AND UNDER SEC.10-A KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION (AMENDMENT) ACT 2020 FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT.

¶20

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

ORDER

¶22

A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the petition and liberty is sought for to file an appropriate appeal before the concerned Court.

¶23

A memo is placed on record.

¶24

3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as

¶25

withdrawn and liberty sought for is granted.

¶26

Any time consumed in pursuing this revision petition shall be deducted, while calculating the limitation applicable to any proceedings that may be filed by the petitioner.

¶27

Office is directed to return the certified copy of the

¶28

impugned order and any original document filed along with the

¶29

3 - NC: 2023:KHC:44153 CRP No. 719 of 2023

¶30

revision petition to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photo copies of same.

¶31

Sd/JUDGE

¶32

KBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33 CT: BHK

Smt. Ashritha @ Arshitha v. Panchayathi Development Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Ashritha @ Arshitha v. Panchayathi Development Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K L Ravindranatha Reddy Vs Smt Deveeramma K N

Shivanand N Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt.Rathnamma Vs Smt.Kempamma

Smt. Gajalakshmi N Vs N. Nagaraj

Mr.Jayanth Vs Tisha

Dr. Nagabhusan Vs State of Karnataka