This is a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an order or appoint an administrator. The court recorded the petitioners' counsel's submission that the petition had become infructuous and dismissed it on those grounds without detailed reasoning.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION No.57931/2015 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, NO.2, 14TH MAIN ROAD, MADIWALA NEW EXTENSION, BANGALORE – 560 068.
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, NO.11/11, 9TH CROSS, VENKATAPURA, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE – 560 034.
NO.33, 1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS, MARUTHI NAGAR, MADIWALA, BANGALORE – 560 068.
AND:
BHANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 029.
(BY SRI M. VINOD KUMAR, ADDL. GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R-1 TO R-3 AND R-5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 12.11.2014 PASSED BY R-3 AT ANNEXURE-C; AND IN ALTERNATIVE DIRECT R-1 TO 3 TO APPOINT THE ADMINISTRATOR TO LOOK AFTER THE PROPERTIES OF THE UNION I.E., M/S. STUMPP SCHUELE SOMAPPA EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (REGD.) NOW CHANGED AS M/S. STUMPP SCHELE AND SOMAPPA SPRINGS PVT. LTD.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Honna Raju R. appearing for Sri M.Babu Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition has become infructuous and he would file a memo to this effect during the course of the day.
infructuous.
SD/JUDGE
S*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 should be allowed when it has become infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI H. GOPALAKRISHNA
STATE OF KARNATAKA
K.S. HEMALEKHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
