Dismissed
Sri.Govindappa v. the Tahsildar Chintamani
Karnataka HCWP/3651/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.3651 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN
SRI.GOVINDAPPA SON OF LATE CHIKKA PAPANAYAK AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS OCCUPATION AGRICULTURIST RESIDENT OF MARINAYAKANAHALLY MURUGAMALL HOBLI CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B R SRINIVASA GOWDA., ADVOCATE) AND
THE TAHSILDAR CHINTAMANI, TALUK CHINTAMANI, CHICKBALLAPURA DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, COMMANDING THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 08.05.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-C FORTHWITH
W.P.NO.3651/2021
2
AND SUPPLY THE DOCUMENTS AS SOUGHT FOR BY THE PETITIONER AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER.
ORDER
Petitioner’s counsel submits that cost is already paid. Office to verify.
Other office objections to be complied within one week failing which, writ petition stands rejected on its own.
Sd/JUDGE
TYPED BY : SK CASE WORKER : JK COMPARED BY : JK
COPY
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SRI.GOVINDAPPA SON OF LATE CHIKKA PAPANAYAK
THE TAHSILDAR CHINTAMANI
KRISHNA S DIXIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court