Sri Istakees @ Joseph v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India under non-prosecution by the petitioner, failing to comply with office time. Petition dismissed.
Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India under non-prosecution by the petitioner, failing to comply with office time. Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO.20092 OF 2019 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
SRI ISTAKEES @ JOSEPH S/O LATE AVALAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.34, 35TH MAIN ROAD, H M NAYAK ROAD, S.W.D., JAI MARUTHI NAGARA, NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU – 560096.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAGHU.M, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. H R SANJEEVE GOWDA., ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
WARD NO.43, NANDINI LAYOUT, POLICE STATION ROAD, BENGALURU – 560086.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN APPEAL NO.691/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (CH.NO.2) AT BENGALURU AND PERUSE THE RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 17.11.2017 PASSED BY THE HON’LE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (C.H.NO.2) AT BENGALURU I.E., ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This Court by order dated 13.07.2022 had granted
two weeks time to comply with the office objections, failing which, the petition would stand dismissed with reference to Bench.
Sd/JUDGE
JT/-
Sri Istakees @ Joseph
The Commissioner Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
M.G.S. Kamal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court