The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. The court accepted the contention that the subsequent events rendered the legal basis of the petition obsolete, thereby deciding the matter without examining merits of the impugned show cause notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.G.S.KAMAL
WRIT PETITION NO.10978 OF 2021 (LB - BMP)
BETWEEN:
VEDIC LORE A TRUST REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIA TRUST ACT E-168 & 169
MANYATA RESIDENCY RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE BENGALURU - 560 045 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE MS. ISHWARYA IYER
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.MAHESH A.S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 10.02.2020 ANNEXURE A ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2, ETC.
2
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Memo dated 02.08.2022 is filed seeking dismissal of
the writ petition on the premise that the petition has become infructuous.
Memo is placed on record.
Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
MKM
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vedic Lore A Trust
Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagare Palike
Assistant Executive Officer, BBMP
M.G.S. Kamal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
