Shri Poojari Narayanappa v. Smt. Lakshmidevamma
Case brief
What is this about?
This review petition challenged an order allowing a writ regarding land alienation, citing absent counsel and pre-1979 alienation. The court held that the primary challenge was filed in 2006, over twenty-five years after the Act commenced, constituting unreasonable delay.
What did the court decide?
Review petition rejected; original order in W.P.No.13630/2014 stands.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
REVIEW PETITION NO. 15 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SHRI. POOJARI NARAYANAPPA, SON OF SRI. MUNISWAMI, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT VINOBHA COLONY CHINTAMANI,
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. V.K. NARAYANASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MUTHURAJU A AND SMT. K. PUSHPALATHA, ADVOCATES)
AND:
- SMT. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA, W/O. LATE SRIRAMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a review petition should be allowed on grounds of absent counsel and alleged unrecorded facts regarding representation since 1984.
Whether a challenge to land alienation filed in 2006 under the PTCL Act is considered reasonable given a 25-year delay after the Act's commencement.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shri. Poojari Narayanappa
- respondent
Smt. Lakshmidevamma
- respondent
Smt. Shivakumari
- respondent
State of Karnataka
- respondent
Deputy Commissioner, Chikmagalur
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- RP/15/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court