The petition was dismissed solely because the petitioner filed a memo seeking its withdrawal on the day of hearing. Consequently, all ancillary applications stand disposed of with no legal principle laid down.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; interlocutory applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
CIVIL PETITION NO.302 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
ANNEGOWDA S/O. APPAJIGOWDA AGED MAJOR ECHALAHALLY VILLAGE KANDLI POST, KASABA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER HEMAVATHI RESERVOIR PLANNING-2 (H.R.P.II) HASSAN.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. JYOTHI BHAT, HCGP)
THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 44 RULE 1 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, PRAYING TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO PROSECUTE MFA NO.7278/2015 AS AN INDIGENT PERSON BY ALLOWING THIS CIVIL PETITION AND ETC.
THIS CIVIL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
dated 03.11.2022 with a prayer to withdraw the petition.
Memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of dismissal of the petition, interlocutory applications if any, do not survive for consideration and the same are hereby disposed of.
SD/JUDGE
VMB
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Annegowda S/o. Appajigowda
Special Land Acquisition Officer Hemavathi Reservoir Planning-2 (H.R.P.II) Hassan
M.I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
