Sri Kempanna v. Sri Rakshit K R
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court, Bengaluru, addressed a contempt petition filed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Upon notice being taken of the Tahasildar's acceptance of the complainant's representation, the court decided to drop the contempt proceedings without further ado.
What did the court decide?
Contempt proceedings against the Tahasildar and the State were dropped.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA
AND
THE HON’BLE Mrs. JUSTICE M.G. UMA
C.C.C. No.831/2021 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
SRI. KEMPANNA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O LATE SRI. BORAIAH, R/O NO:228, ALLANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK AND DISTRICT - 570 015. MOBILE NO.9740133610
...COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI S.M. BABU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
- SRI. RAKSHIT K.R. THE TAHSILDAR, MYSORE TALUK, MYSORE - 570 001.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow or drop contempt proceedings instituted for disobedience of the court's order.
The appropriate action regarding the representations made by the complainant to the Tahasildar.
Coram
B. Veerappa
M.G. Uma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CCC/831/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court