The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after accepting counsel's memo seeking withdrawal, as the petition had become futile.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
W.P.No.8240/2020 (S - CAT)
BETWEEN:
DR. JAYAKUMAR T.M., S/O MALLAPPA T., AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT SUNITHA NILAYA, NEAR VETERINARY COLLEGE, SIDDHAGANGA BADAVANE, SHIVAMOGGA – 577 204. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GOVINDARAJ.K. JOISA, ADV.)
AND:
2
SIR VISHWESHWARAYA KENDRIYA BHAVAN, DOMBLUR, BANGALORE – 560 071. REPRESENTED ITS REGISTRAR.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. C.SHASHIKANTHA, ASG.)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-3 TO CONSTITUTE THE BENCH FOR HEARING OF APPLICATION DATED:18.05.2020 WHICH IS NUMBERED AS OA NO.170/282/2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-K AND DIRECT THE TRIBUNAL TO DISPOSE OFFENCES THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, NAGARATHNA, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition as it became infructuous.
Memo is taken on record.
3
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
KTY
Dr. Jayakumar T.M.
The Union of India
The Union Public Service Commission
The Central Administrative Tribunal Bangalore Bench
B.V. Nagarathna
N.S. Sanjay Gowda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
