The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The petitioner was given permission to withdraw the petition. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
W.P.No.3623/2021 (S – CAT)
BETWEEN:
NARAYANA P, S/O SHRI PUTTA MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.18, 1ST BLOCK, VIDYARANYGA PURAM, MYSORE – 570 008.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. TARSEM CHAND GUPTA, ADV.)
AND:
2
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO IN VIEW OF THE FACTS AND GROUNDS ENUMERATED ABOVE, IT IS MOST RESPECTFULLY PRAYED THAT THE CAT BENCH BANGALORE MAY BE DIRECTED TO DECIDE THE OA/MATTER, ANNEXURE-A, WITHIN STIPULATED PERIOD AND NOT TO RESORT TO DILATORY AND EVASIVE TACTICS.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, NAGARATHNA, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
Memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
KTY
Narayana P
Union of India
Superintending Engineer
B.V.Nagarathna
N.S.Sanjay Gowda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
