Petitioner sought to quash a tender notification condition under Article 226 Constitution of India. Court held petition infructuous and disposed of the matter with liberty to move a memo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.8016/2020 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
A. Thyagaraju S/o. Late Avalappa Aged about 45 years R/at Opposite to Railway Station Road Chintamani Town, Chikkaballapur District - 562 105.
… PETITIONER
(BY Sri. Sanchan, Advocate for Sri. G. Balakrishna Shastry, Advocate)
AND:
The Commissioner City Municipality Chintamani Town, Chikkaballapur District - 562 105.
... RESPONDENT
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash condition No.15 in the tender notification dated 08.05.2020 published by the Commissioner City Municipality, Chintamani at Annexure-A.
This Writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, petition is disposed off as having become infructuous, with liberty to move a memo in the event it is otherwise, within four weeks from this day.
Costs made easy.
Sd/JUDGE
VP
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. Thyagaraju
The Commissioner City Municipality Chintamani Town
Krishna S. Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
