Padmanabha H.P v. Union of India Represented by the
Case brief
What is this about?
Court disposed of writ petition challenging suspension of railway food stalls as infructuous due to implementation of new catering policy and efflux of time.
Court disposed of writ petition challenging suspension of railway food stalls as infructuous due to implementation of new catering policy and efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.55053 OF 2015 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
2
3
(PETITIONER NOS.8, 9, 10, 11 - NOT CLAIMING SENIOR CITIZENSHIP)
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VENKATESH KUMAR B.S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ABHINAY Y.T., ADV FOR R2 & R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION CALLING FOR THE RECORDS LEADING TO THE ISSUE OF ANNEXURE-J NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.COMML/MYS/18/2015 DATED 02.09.2015 ISSUED BY THE MYSORE DIVISION OF SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY (THIRD RESPONDENT) AND QUASH THE SAME TO THE EXTENT IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONERS' STALLS; ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION COMMANDING THE RESPONDENTS TO RENEW THE LICENCES OF THE PETITIONERS ON SUCH TERMS AND CONDITONS AS THE RESPONDENTS MIGHT LIKE TO FIX IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, WITHIN A TIME FRAME AS MIGHT BE FOUND JUST AND PROPER BY THIS HON'BLE COURT; AWARD COSTS OF AND INCIDENTAL TO THIS PETITION AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
4
ORDER
This petition is disposed off as having become
infructuous in terms of the Memo dated 01.12.2021 filed by
learned counsel for respondents, which reads as under:
" It is submitted that the above petition is filed seeking to quash the tender notification dated 2.9.2015, which was based on catering policy 2010.
It is submitted that during the pendency of the petition, catering policy 2017 is brought inforce and also due to efflux of time, the petition has become infructuous.
WHEREFORE, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to take this memo on record and dismiss the petition as infructuous, in the interest of justice and equity."
Accordingly, writ petition is disposed off as having
become infructuous, in terms of the above memo.
Sd/JUDGE
RR
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PADMANABHA H.P
UNION OF INDIA
KRISHNA S.DIXIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court