On preliminary hearing, High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 undertook that the underlying miscellaneous jurisdiction application has been disposed.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.56763 OF 2018 (GM-AC)
BETWEEN :
ROSHAN ZAMEER S/O NOORAHMED PASHA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS R/O 279/1, II MAIN KEMPEGOWDA NAGAR DASARAHALLI BENGALURU-57 …PETITIONER
(BY SHRI. S.B.HALLI, ADVOCATE)
AND :
(BY SHRI. E.I.SANMATHI FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 05.12.2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SCCH-15-XIII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSE JUDGE AND XXXVIII ACMM COURT, AT BENGALURU IN MVC
2
NO.535/2018 ON IA FILED UNDER ORDER XVII RULE 17 R/W 151 OF THE CPC AND ALSO IA FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC DATED 05.12.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-E TO THIS WRIT PETITION AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Shri E.I.Sanmathi, learned advocate for respondent No.2 submits that MVC.No.535/2018 has been disposed on 02.01.2019 and MFA.No.660/2019 has been filed. His submission is placed on record. He undertakes to send a memo to this effect. Once received, Registry shall keep the same in record.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
AV
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Roshan Zameer
Ravikumar R
New India Assurance Company Ltd.
P.S. DINESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
