Disposed

Sri Brahmi Industrial Training Institute v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC28 Jul 2021WP/6411/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed seeking direction to respondents to consider petitioner's representations regarding financial amounts for the period 2006-2020. Court disposed of preliminary hearing after respondents agreed to consider submissions within three months.

What did the court decide?

Pending direction to respondents to consider petitioner's representations within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Sri Brahmi Industrial Training Institute… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 28^TH DAY OF JULY, 2021

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION No.6411 OF 2021 (GM-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN :

¶8

SRI. BRAHMI INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE BEHIND AZAD FLOURMILL REPD. BY IT'S SECRETARY CHITRADURGA-577 501 …PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SHRI. C. GOPALAKRISHNAMURTHY, ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND :

¶11

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶12

BY ITS SECRETARY

¶13

SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA

¶14

BENGALURU-560 001

¶15

THE COMMISSIONER

¶16

SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING

¶17

BENGALURU-560 001

¶18

THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (GRADE-I) TALUK SOCIAL SCHEDULED TRIBE WELFARE DEPARTMENT

¶19

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 501

¶20

THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (GRADE-I) TALUK SOCIAL SCHEDULED

¶21

¶22

CASTE WELFARE DEPARTMENT CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 501 ... RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SHRI. B.V. KRISHNA, AGA)

¶24

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE ANNEXURE-B DTD.14.12.2020 RS.31,72,500/- FROM THE PERIOD OF 2006-2020 AND ANOTHER ANNEXURE-C DTD.14.12.2020 RS.33,71,300 FROM THE PERIOD OF 2006-2020 BY WAY OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND ETC.

¶25

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶26

ORDER

¶27

Heard Shri Gopalakrishnamurthy, learned advocate for petitioner and Shri B.V.Krishna, learned AGA for respondents No.1 to 4.

¶28

Petitioner has filed this petition for a direction against respondents to consider it's representation as per Annexures B and C.

¶29

Learned AGA submitted that petitioner's representations as per Annexures-B & C will be considered by respondents in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶30

¶31

Learned advocate for petitioner is satisfied with the

¶32

submission of learned AGA.

¶33

This petition is accordingly disposed of by recording

¶34

the submission of learned AGA.

¶35

No costs.

¶36

Sd/JUDGE

¶37

Sri Brahmi Industrial Training Institute v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Brahmi Industrial Training Institute v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Nissar Begum Vs the State of Karnataka

Sheena Poojary Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Venkataramappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri.Kashif Fayaz Vs the Executive Director

Smt. Lakshmamma Vs the Managing Director

Smt.Munirathnamma Vs the State of Karnataka