Petitioners challenged Government Orders under Article 226 of the Constitution. Counsel withdrew the writ petition as it became infructuous. The court dismissed the petition.
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
W.P. NO.23972 OF 2017 (GM-PDS)
BETWEEN:
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-561203.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. NAVEEN J.N., ADVOCATE)
2
AND:
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
3
GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 13.4.2017 AND 05.05.2017 RESPECTIVELY BEARING NO.A.NA.SA 104 E.BHA.THA 2107 AND NO.A.NA.SA 114 DRA 206 (PART-2) ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND E AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has filed a Memo to withdraw the writ petition as having become infructuous.
infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
hnm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ petition becomes infructuous upon Withdrawal by the petitioners
2 provisions across 2 enactments
H.L. Narayana Shetty S/O Lakshminarayana Shetty
C.S. Chandrashekaraiah S/O Siddalingappa
S.N. Venkatachalapathi S/O Nanjappa
The Union of India Ministry of Food, Public Distribution System and Consumer Affairs
The State of Karnataka Department of Food and Civil Supplies
The Commissioner for Food and Civil Supplies
R. Nataraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
