This judgment dismisses a review petition filed under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court held that the petition attempted to re-argue the case on merits, which is impermissible, and no error apparent on the face of the record existed aside from a minor clerical correction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
REVIEW PETITION NO.30 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
Smt. B. Nagarathna W/o Sri. B.M.Venkatesh Aged about 43 years R/at No.537, 537/1, New No.08, 1st Cross Kamatageri, Nazarbad Mohalla, Mysuru – 570001.
...Petitioner
(By Sri. Sathisha D.J., Advocate)
AND:
Smt. Devamma W/o late Channaiah, Aged about 66 years, R/at Balludagari Village, Hummadahalli Post, Mandya District – 571401.
... Respondent
(By Sri. Veerabhadra Swamy H.P., Advocate)
This Review Petition is filed under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1(a) of CPC, praying to allow this Review Petition by review the order dated 13.02.2020 in RSA No.909/2012 in the interest of justice and equity and grant such other and further relief as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.
2
This Petition coming on for Admission this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
This Review Petition is filed to review the order dated 13.02.2020 passed in R.S.A. No.909/2012.
3
Puttananjappa, namely, Ramanna and Mahadevu” and the same needs to be corrected and the words “by the sons of Puttananjappa, namely,” are ordered to be deleted. Except for this correction, there is no error apparent on the face of the record.
same is dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
NR/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition discloses an error apparent on the face of the record warranting correction of the impugned order.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. B. Nagarathna W/o Sri. B.M.Venkatesh
Smt. Devamma W/o late Channaiah
Nataraj Rangaswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
