Dismissed
Smt Parvathamma v. Sri Dr Mohamed Altaf Hussain
Karnataka HCWP/19974/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution to recall a witness for cross-examination in an o.s. case that sought recall of a witness via the trial court. The petitioner's counsel submitted the suit was dismissed, rendering the petition infructuous; the petitioner was to send proof. The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.