Petitioners sought withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 9646 of 2021 filed under Article 2227. Court recorded submission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
None. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No. 9646 OF 2021 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN :
(BY SHRI.K.GURUDHATTA, ADVOCATE)
AND :
(BY SHRI.M.D.RAGHUNATH, ADVOCATE)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE LEARNED LVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE (CCH-58), MAYOHALL IN O.S.NO.25993/2016 FOR DISPOSAL OF THS SUIT AT EARLIEST VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Shri Gurudhatta, learned advocate for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this petition. He submits that he has already sent a memo to this effect through E-mail. His submission is placed on record.
2. Memo be kept in record. The petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
No costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE
AV
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MR. ABDUL AZEEZ
MRS.AZZEZ SHATAZ BEGUM
MR.IRFAN PASHA
MRS.SALMN IRFAN
P.S. DINESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
