The Court held the present writ petition under Article 226 as infructuous upon undertaking by the learned Advocate for the petitioner. The petition was dismissed with no costs.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.16091 OF 2019 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN :
SRI. B. NAGESH S/O BOREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS RESIDING AT II CROSS LEELAVATHI LAYOUT
MADDUR TOWN
MANDYA DISTRICT …PETITIONER
(BY SHRI. MANJUNATH FOR SHRI. T. SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATES)
AND :
2
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDING K.H.NAGAR MADDUR TOWN
RESPONDENTS NO.5 & 6 ARE THE MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN - MOTHER RESPONDENT NO.4
RESPONDENTS NO.4 TO 6 ARE RESIDING AT LEELAVATHI EXTENSION 6TH CROSS, MADDUR TOWN ... RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD. 13.02.2019 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MADDUR IN M.A.5/2017 VIDE ANNX-K.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Shri. Manjunath Hegde, learned Advocate for petitioner
submits that this writ petition is rendered infructuous. He
undertakes to file a Memo to the said effect.
3
Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
SPS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B. Nagesh
Yogendra M.S.
Shivalingiah
Thejendra
Mamatha
Gagan
P.S. Dinesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
