Dismissed
Manjamma v. Thippaiah
Karnataka HCWP/11197/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This single sentence order dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the underlying suit was disposed of. The petitioner undertook to file a memo which could not be relied upon in the judgment text.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous without costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
¶3
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021
¶4
BEFORE
¶5
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
¶6
WRIT PETITION No.11197 OF 2019 (GM-CPC)
¶7
BETWEEN :
¶8
- MANJAMMA
¶9
- W/O LATE SHARANAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
¶10
- NAGARAJ
¶11
- S/O LATE SHARANAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
¶12
- MANJUNATH
¶13
- S/O LATE SHARANAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Manjamma
- petitioner
Nagaraj
- petitioner
Manjunath
- petitioner
Nethramma
- respondent
Thippiiah
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/11197/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court