Petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking to quash a notice/letter but the Court found the petitioner had died and disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.1413 OF 2020(GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFER, S/O DASTAGIR SAB, AGED ABOUT 94 YEARS, 3RD CROSS, VINAYAKA LAYOUT, SULTHANPALYA, R T NAGAR POST, BENGALURU – 560 032. (NOT CLAIMING BENEFITS OF SENIOR CITIZENSHIP)
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. V F KUMBAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. N S PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE/LETTER DATED 06.06.2019 VIDE AT ANNEXURE-B AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
The petitioner having died, it is submitted, the petition has become infructuous. Accordingly the same is disposed off.
Sd/JUDGE
Snb/
SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFER
THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAYS
THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY
THE SENIOR DIVISION COMMERCIAL MANAGER, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY
Krishna S.Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
