Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Umesh Vs Smt. Anusuya — Succession and Inheritance | Karnataka HC (2021)

Home
Karnataka HC
2021
Umesh Vs Smt. AnusuyaUmesh v. Smt. Anusuya

Dismissed

Umesh v. Smt. Anusuya

Karnataka HC30 Jul 2021RSA/1628/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal under Section 100 CPC dismissed as final decree proceedings were concluded. No substantive reasoning provided beyond the procedural bar.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 30^TH DAY OF JULY, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1628 OF 2013

Between:

Umesh

Since dead by his LR’s

1(a) Lakshmamma W/o Late Umesh

Aged about 48 years,

1(b) Mohan.U

S/o Late Umesh

Aged about 26 years,

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Umesh Since dead by his LR's
respondent
Anusuya
respondent
Padmamma
respondent
Bhagayamma
respondent
Janardhana Setty
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 30 Jul 2021 · July
Registered: 8 Oct 2013
Case no.: RSA/1628/2013

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from E.s.indiresh

K. H. Eshwarappa Vs Sri. K. S. Basavarajappa
29 Jul 2021
Sri. Krishnappa Vs Sri. Puttalingaiah
29 Jul 2021
Smt. Mahadevamma Vs Smt. Jayamma
29 Jul 2021
V Narayana Swamy Vs Marappa
30 Jul 2021

Cite this judgement

Umesh v. Smt. Anusuya, RSA/1628/2013 (KA), decided on 30 July 2021.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

E.S. Indires

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

In a regular second appeal concerning succession or property, the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dismissed the appeal on the ground that final decree proceedings were concluded. No substantive legal principle or reasoning was expounded in this short order.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

1(c ) Yogesha.U S/o Late Umesh

Aged about 23 years,

1(d) Paramesha.U S/o Late Umesh

Aged about 21 years,

The appellants No.1(a) to 1(d) are Residing at Gundappa Street, Opposite to Municipal Hospital, Chikkamagalur Town - 577 101.

(by Sri H.N.M Prasad, Advocate)

…Appellants

2

And:

Smt.Anusuya

W/o Gangadhara Setty Aged about 63 years R/o Opp. Pension Mohalla, Police Station, Agrahara Road, Hassan - 573 201.

Smt. Padmamma

W/o Jayarama Setty Aged about 58 years Opp. SBJ Bar, Main Road Nehru Nagar Beluru Town and Post Hassan District-573 201.

Smt. Bhagayamma W/o late Rajanna Setty Aged about 56 years Near Shivajyothi Kalyana Mantap Adlimane Road, I Cross Shanthinagara Sangameshwara Extension Hassan-573 201.

Janardhana Setty S/o late Kalinga Setty Aged about 54 years Pleginamma Street Vijayapura Extension Chikmagalur-577 201.

Smt. Kalavathi W/o Murthy Aged about 50 years Aravinda Bendar Opp: Bus Stand

3

Pandavapura Town Mandya District-571 401.

Raju S/o late Kalinga Setty Aged about 48 years Bank Employee C/o Padmamma W/o Jayaram Setty Opp:SBJ Bar, Main Road Nehru Nagar Belur Town and Post Hassan District-573 201.

Ramachandra

S/o late Kalinga Setty Electrician Opp: Police Station Pension Mohalla Agrahara Street Hassan-573 201.

Smt. Vanitha W/o Nagesha Aged about 44 years Housing Board K R Nagara Mysore District-570 001.

…Respondents (by Shri Rajashekar, Advocate for R1, 3 and 5 to 8; R4 served)

This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 23.06.2011 passed in Regular Appeal No.20 of 2011 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Chikmagalore, partly allowing the appeal and modifying the judgment and decree dated 07.01.2011 passed in OS.No.438 of 2008 on the file of the I Additional Civil Judge, Chikmagalur.

4

This Appeal coming on for admission, this day, the court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating

that final decree proceedings are concluded. In view of the

same, the Regular Second Appeal does not survive for consideration.

Memo is placed on record.

Accordingly, appeal is dismissed.

Sd/JUDGE

UN

Kalavathi

Coram

AI extract

E.S. Indires

CNR

KAHC010390832013

Topic

Succession and Inheritance

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED

Sri. Krishnachari Vs P Narayanappa

30 Jul 2021

Syed Nissar Ahamed Vs Farhan Ameen Sulthan

30 Jul 2021