Second appeal filed for non-prosecution by appellants who failed to argue the matter before admission; dismissed without consideration of merits.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution based on order dated 23.10.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
R.S.A. No.476 OF 2016 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 433.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.M.PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE)
2
AND:
SRI PUTTALINGAIAH S/O PIDDI NINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT CHAMALAPURA VILLAGE ATHAGUR HOBLI MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571433
... RESPONDENT
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.10.2015 PASSED IN R.A.NO.16/2007 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MADDUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.02.2007 PASSED IN O.S.NO.30/2002 ON THE FILE OF ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN.), JMFC., MADDUR
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
There is no representation on behalf of the appellants.
year 2016 and no efforts have been made to argue the matter on admission and therefore, taking into
3
account the order dated 23.10.2019 passed by this Court, appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
NBM
1. SRI. KRISHNAPPA S/O MARIYAPPA, 2. SRI. NINGAIAH S/O. KEMPEGOWDA, 3. SRI. B.CHANNEGOWDA S/O. BANDHIGEGOWDA, 4. SRI. BANDIGAIAH S/O KARIGOWDA, 5. SRI. GIRIYAIA
SRI PUTTALINGAIAH S/O PIDDI NINGEGOWDA
E.S. INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
