Dismissed

R v. Ganesha Bhatta v State Bank of Mysore

Karnataka HC5 Oct 2021RSA/1288/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC against a judgment and decree of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Chikmagaluru. The court observed that the appellant's counsel was absent on multiple dates despite being granted a final opportunity to appear. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.

What did the court decide?

The Regular Second Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.

R v Ganesha Bhatta Vs State Bank of Mysore — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 05^TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶5

R.S.A. No.1288/2014

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

R V GANESHA BHATTA AGED 62 YEARS S/O LATE VENKATARAMANA BHATTA ARCHAK BY PROFESSION HARIHARA STREET SRINGERI TOWN-577 139.

¶8

... APPELLANT

¶9

(BY SMT. SHEELA KRISHNA AND SRI T K VISHWAJITH, ADVOCATES FOR APPELLANT (ABSENT))

¶10

AND:

¶11

STATE BANK OF MYSORE SRINGERI BRANCH SRINGERI-577 1439.

¶12

... RESPONDENT

¶13

(BY SRI T P MUTHANNA, ADVOCATE)

¶14

THIS R.S.A. IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 03.06.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.108/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CHIKMAGALUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.08.2012 PASSED IN OS.NO.27/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRINGERI.

¶15

THIS R.S.A. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

¶17

JUDGMENT

¶18

There is no representation on behalf of the appellant.

¶19

As could be seen from the order sheet, when the matter was called on 16.10.2019, 27.11.2019 and 12.04.2021, none appeared for the appellant. On 16.04.2021, this court granted last opportunity to the appellant to appear before the Court stating that if there is no representation on the next date, the appeal will be disposed of.

¶20

Sri.T.P.Muthanna, learned counsel for the

¶21

respondent submits that the appeal is of the year 2014 and learned counsel for the appellant is absent on regular basis.

¶22

This would indicate that the appellant is not interested to pursue the appeal. Therefore, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

JUDGE

¶25

SB

R v. Ganesha Bhatta v State Bank of Mysore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R v. Ganesha Bhatta v State Bank of Mysore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt Siddamma Vs Sri S Yashas

Smt Sowbhagyamma Vs Smt Siddagangamma

Karunakara Vs S K Jaganmohoni

Smt Parveen Taj Vs Smt Gulab Jan

Smt. Chandramma Vs Sri. Venkatappa

Mrs Umavathi a Shetty Vs Mr Padmanabha Shetty