Karunakara v. S K Jaganmohoni
Case brief
What is this about?
In Regular Second Appeal No.610 of 2019, the Court granted three weeks to comply with office objections. Failure to do so results in dismissal for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Three weeks time granted to comply with office objections.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.610 OF 2019
BETWEEN
- 1 KARUNAKARA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
S/O CHENAPPA GOWDA,
R./AT AMAI HOUSE, UBARADKA MITHOOR VILLGE AND POST, SULLIA TALUK D.K. 574248
- 2 VENKATRAMMA GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
S/O CHENAPPA GOWDA,
R/AT AMAI HOSUE,
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Karunakara
- appellant
Smt Kaveramma
- appellant
Lokayya
- appellant
Chidananda
- appellant
Padmavathi
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/610/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court