Dismissed
Smt Parveen Taj v. Smt Gulab Jan
Karnataka HCRSA/28/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
R.S.A. No.28/2015
BETWEEN:
1 . SMT PARVEEN TAJ AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS OCC HOUSE WIFE
2 . SRI NAZEER AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS OCC AGRICULTURIST
3 . SRI SYED WASEEM AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS
4 . SRI SYED YASEEN AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS
5 . RUKSAR AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS (MINOR)
6 . SYED TABREZ AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS (MINOR)
7 . SYED FASUK AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS (MINOR)
ALL ARE SONS OF LATE SYED AMJAD AND ALL ARE RESIDING AT MUJAWAR MOHALLA MULBAGAL TOWN LRS 3C TO 3E BING MINORS ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR GUARDIAN SRI SYED YASEEN
2
8 . SRI SUHAIL AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS OCC AGRICULTURIST
9 . MUMTHAJ BEGUM W/O LATE AMEER JAN AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
10 . CHANPASHA S/O AMEER JAN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
11 . RESHMATAJ S/O LATE AMEER JAN AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
12 . HASEENA TAJ S/O LATE AMEER JAN AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
13 . ZABEN TAJ D/O LATE AMEER JAN AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
14 . ISMAIL D/O LATE AMEER JAN AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF MUJAWAR MOHALLA MULBAGAL TOWN.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI ANANTHAKRISHNAMURTHY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1 . SMT. GULAB JAN W/O SARDAR AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
3
OCC HOUSE WIFE R/AT KATARIPALYA KOLAR TOWN.
2 . ABDUL REHMAN @ BABU S/O LATE SHAIK ISMAIL BUSINESSMEN AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
3 . SHAIK ASLAM PASHA S/O LATE SHAIK ISMAIL AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
4 . SMT JAIRUNNISSA W/O LATE SHAIK ISMAIL AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
5 . MALIKA JAN D/O LATE SHAIK ISMAIL AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
6 . NAGINA BEGUM W/O LATE SHAIK ISMAIL AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
7 . KAUSER BEGUM D/O LATE SHAIK ISMAIL AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
8 . SHAHANAZ BEGUM D/O LATE SHAIK ISMAIL AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
9 . SHAIK AMEER JAN S/O LATE SHAIK ABDUL RAHAMAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT ARACANUT MERCHANT BAZAR STREET MULBAGAL TOWN -563 131.
10 . SMT FATHIMABEE D/O KASIM SAB
4
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 11 . KUM FERYINTAJ D/O FATHIMABEE AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
12 . SHAIK HYDER @ MANNA S/O FATHIMABEE AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
13 . KUM. HEYIN TAJ D/O FATHIMABEE AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
R10 TO 13 ARE ALL R/AT KANTHARAJ CIRCLE MULBAGAL TOWN.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI G PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 AND ALSO FOR R2 TO 8; R10 SERVED)
THIS R.S.A. IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 17.11.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.20/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE ii ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLAR, ITINERATING AT MULBAGAL, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.12.2011 PASSED IN OS.NO.476/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) JMFC, MULBAGAL.
THIS R.S.A. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sri.H.R.Ananthakrishna Murthy, learned counsel
for the appellants submits that the parties to the appeal have settled the matter out of the court and in
5
this regard, the appellants have filed a memo dated 15.09.2021.
Memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the regular second appeal stands
disposed of in terms of the memo.
Sd/JUDGE
SB
SMT PARVEEN TAJ
SRI NAZEER
SRI SUHAIL
SMT GULAB JAN
ABDUL REHMAN @ BABU
SHAIK ASLAM PASHA
E.S.INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court