The High Court at Bengaluru disposed of a revision petition not pressed by the petitioner, who agreed to pursue a modification petition under Section 127 CrPC instead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
R.P.F.C.No.127 OF 2014
BETWEEN:
S.R.Krishna Murthy, S/o. Late Ramaiah, Aged about 58 years, Residing at No.8, 2nd Cross, Cholurupalya, Magadi Main Road, Bangalore-23. .. Petitioner
( By Sri Ullas Kumar Jain, Advocate )
AND:
Smt. Umadevi, W/o S.R.Krishnan, 53 years, Residing at No.547, 10th `E' Main, 6th Block, Rajajinagar, Bangalore-560 010. .. Respondent
( By Sri Anandeeswar D.R., Advocate)
This R.P.F.C filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, against the order dated 11.7.2014, passed in Crl.Misc.No.159/2010, on the file of the V Addl.Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru, allowing the petition filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. for maintenance.
RPFC.No.127/2014
2
This R.P.F.C coming on for Hearing, through Physical Hearing/Video Conferencing Hearing this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel from both side are physically present in
the Court.
In the light of the above submission, the present Petition stands disposed of as not pressed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
bk/-
3 provisions across 2 enactments
S.R.Krishna Murthy
Umadevi
H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
