Sri Puttaswamy v. Smt Puttamanjula @ Manjula
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
R.P.F.C. No. 155 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
Sri. Puttaswamy, Aged about 48 years, S/o late Mahadevappa, R/at Doddakaturu, Taluru Post, Jayapura Hobli, Mysuru Taluk and District - 570 019.
:PETITIONER
(By Sri P. Nataraju, Advocate)
AND:
2nd respondent is minor,
2
RPFC 155/2019
represented by natural guardian/mother Smt.Puttamanjula @ Manjula, 1st respondent.
Respondents 1 and 2 are R/at Kanchamalli Village, Kanchamalli Post, Hampapura Hobli, H.D. Kote Taluk, Mysuru District - 571 114.
:RESPONDENTS
This R.P.F.C filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, praying to set aside the Order dated 04.06.2019 passed in C.Mis.No.676/2016 on the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court at Mysuru, partly allowing the petition filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.
This R.P.F.C coming on for Orders through Physical Hearing/Video Conferencing Hearing this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of this petition as having become infructuous.
3
RPFC 155/2019
In the memo it is stated that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties, as such, the petitioner is not willing to prosecute this petition.
In view of the memo, the petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
sac*
Puttaswamy
Puttamanjula @ Manjula
Darshan P
H.B. Prabhakar Swamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court