Court dismissed a review petition on the ground that the petitioner had already filed a revision application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal challenging the impugned order of the Magistrate, rendering the review unnecessary.
Review Petition dismissed as unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
REVIEW PETITION No.291 OF 2021
IN WRIT PETITION No.3904 OF 2021 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN
ALL R/AT NO.55, 3RD CROSS BANGIAPPA GARDEN SHANTI NAGAR BANGALORE – 560 027. ... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VASANTH ADITHYA J., ADVOCATE)
2
AND
(BY SRI. R. ASHOK KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 READ WITH ORDER 47 RULES 1 OF CPC, PRAYING THIS HON’BLE COURT TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED:19.08.2021 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION NO.3904/2021 VIDE ANNEXURE –A AND THEREAFTER, PASS NECESSARY ORDERS/ISSUE DIRECTIONS GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF/S IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING
3
ORDER
Sri.R.Ashok Kumar, learned advocate for
respondent-Bank submits that review petitioner has already moved FR No.1418/2021 before the DRT-2 challenging the order of the learned Magistrate.
unnecessary and it is accordingly dismissed .
Sd/JUDGE
bnv*
K.S. PADMANABHAN
SMT. KALPANA K.
SMT. VASANTHA
SMT. AMBICA S.
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER SRI. LAKSHMI MAHILA BANK NIYAMITHA
SRI. LAKSHMI MAHILA SAHAKARA BANK NIYAMITHA
P.S. DINESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court