Review petition under CPC dismissed due to failure to address office objections and absence of petitioner. Court observed matter pending for removal of objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
R.P. NO. 100277/2017 IN R.S.A. NO. 6135/2010 (DEC)
BETWEEN:
GADIGEPPA S/O SHIVAPPA KORI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O BANKAPUR, TQ-SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI.
(BY SRI SUNIL S. DESAI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF CPC SEEKING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.03.2017 PASSED IN R.S.A. NO. 6135/2010 & ETC.
: 2 :
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
On 06.02.2018 learned Additional Registrar
General granted three weeks time for compliance of office objections. Since then, the matter is pending for removing office objections. If really the petitioner is interested to pursue the review petition, he should have attended to the office objections and moved the Court. Petitioners’ counsel is not present and there is no representation. I do not find good reasons to grant time. Hence, the petition is dismissed.
SD/JUDGE
bvv
GADIGEPPA S/O SHIVAPPA KORI
KUMARI VINODA D/O SHIVAPPA KORI
SHEKAPPA S/O SHIVAPPA KORI
CHANBASAPPA S/O SHIVAPPA KORI
SHIVABASAV S/O YALLAPPA VANAHALLI
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
