In this review petition, the High Court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioners failed to address office objections despite granted time and there were no good reasons to extend the time limit.
The review petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
R.P. NO. 100101/2017 IN R.S.A. NO. 1256/2005 (DEC)
BETWEEN:
: 2 :
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
: 3 :
ORDER
On 27.11.2017 learned Additional Registrar General granted three weeks time for compliance of office objections. Since then, the matter is pending for removing office objections. If really the petitioners are interested to pursue the review petition, they should have attended to the office objections and moved the Court. Petitioners’ counsel is present and prays for time. I do not find good reasons to grant time. Hence, the petition is dismissed.
SD/-
JUDGE
bvv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition should be dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Usman Karim Mulla and others
Malangasha Guru Guljarsha Fakir Alias Makandar
The Chairman, The District Wakf Board, Belagavi
Sreenivasa Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
