Dismissed
Usman Karim Mulla v. Appalal
Karnataka HCRP/100102/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Review petition under O. XLVII R. 1 CPC dismissed for non-compliance of objections despite counsel's plea for time.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
¶2
DHARWAD BENCH
¶3
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021
¶4
BEFORE
¶5
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
¶6
R.P. NO. 100102/2017 IN R.S.A. NO. 1091/2005 (DEC)
¶7
BETWEEN:
¶8
- USMAN KARIM MULLA, AGED ABOUT : 58 YEARS, OCC.: FHAKEER & AGRICULTURE, R/O: KARADAGA, TALUK: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
¶9
- SMT. AMIRABAI W/O KARIM MULLA, AGED ABOUT : 57 YEARS, OCC.: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KARADAGA, TALUK: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
¶10
- KARIM BALU MULLA, AGED ABOUT : 57 YEARS, OCC.: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KARADAGA, TALUK: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
¶11
- SHABBIR KARIM MULLA, AGED ABOUT : 37 YEARS, OCC.: SERVICE, R/O: KARADAGA, TALUK: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the Review Petition should be dismissed due to failure to comply with objections.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Usman Karim Mulla and Others
- respondent
Appalal Calling Malangasha Guru Guljarsha Fakir alias Makandar
- respondent
The Chairman, The District Wakf Board, Belagavi
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- RP/100102/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court