Dismissed
Sri.Hanamanth Siddappa Murnal v. Smt.Seetavva W/O Girimallapa Muttur
Karnataka HCRP/100023/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
R.P. NO. 100023/2018 IN R.F.A. NO. 130/2007 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
(BY SRI S.B. HEBBALLI, ADVOCATE)
AND
SMT SEETAVVA W/O GIRIMALLAPPA MUTTUR, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC.:HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O ANTAPUR, TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT, PIN: 587101.
: 2 :
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF CPC SEEKING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.07.2017 PASSED IN R.F.A. NO. 130/2007 & ETC.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
On 28.06.2018 learned Additional Registrar General granted three weeks time for compliance of office objections. Since then, the matter is pending for removing office objections. If really the petitioners are interested to pursue the review petition, they should have attended to the office objections and moved the Court. Petitioners’ counsel is present and prays for time. I do not find good reasons to grant time. Hence, the petition is dismissed.
JUDGE
bvv
SD/-
SRI HANAMANTH SIDDAPPA MURNAL AND OTHERS
SMT SEETAVVA W/O GIRIMALLAPPA MUTTUR
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court