This order notes the withdrawal of the appeal filed by three appellants against a judgment concerning partition of property. The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
RFA NO.671 OF 2018 (PAR-POS)
BETWEEN :
BOTH ARE R/O SHIVARAM NIVASA VIDYANAGAR, NEAR MOUNTAIN VIEW SCHOOL ROAD, BALEHALLI JYOTHINAGAR POST
CHIKKAMANGALURU TALUK – 577 101
… APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.DEVI PRASAD SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
AND :
I. R. DEEPIKA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
2
W/O KANEENA KADIDAL BHARATHIPURA VILLAGE THITHAHALLI TALUK SHIMOGA DISTRICT – 577 201
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.V. D. RAVI RAJ, ADV. AND SRI.A. N. ANIL KUMAR, ADV.)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.12.2017 PASSED IN OS.NO.14/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM., CHIKKAMAGALURU, PARTLY DECREEING AND PARTLY DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo
dated 19.02.2020 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw
the appeal.
Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
ag
I.R. Ravikumar
I.R. Prathika
Smt. S. P. Bhuvana
I. R. Deepika
M.I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
