Sunil v. a v Anjaneyappa
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka allowed the appellants to withdraw the revision application filed under Section 96, Order 41 Rule 1 CPC regarding a suit for partition and permanent injunction, dismissing the appeal as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Leave of Court granted to withdraw the revision application; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
RFA NO.929 OF 2016 (PAR)
BETWEEN :
- SUNIL
- S/O LATE SIDDAGANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
- SMT. PUSHPA D/O LATE SIDDAGANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/AT #203 7TH CROSS, WARD NO.1
- JALAHALLI WEST POST
K.G.HALLI, BENGALURU – 560 015 … APPELLANTS
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sunil S/O Late Siddagangappa
- appellant
Smt. Pushpa D/O Late Siddagangappa
- respondent
A. V. Anjaneyappa S/O Late Eradasappa
- respondent
Sharadamma W/O Siddappa
- respondent
Mangalamma W/O VenkATEPPA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/929/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court