This judgment records the withdrawal of the appeal in RFA No.1867 of 2017 filed under Section 96 CPC. The court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn upon the filing of a memo dated 06.07.2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
RFA NO.1867 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN :
S/O BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
ANNAPURA
TIPATURU TALUK-572 201
2
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS HOGENAGHATTA TIPATURU TALUK-572 201
TIPATURU TALUK-572 201
3
DASARIGHATTA POST TIPTUR TALUK … APPELLANTS
(BY SRI S.N.BHAT, ADV.)
AND :
4
S/O HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS NEERAGUNDA
HOSADURGA TALUK – 577 527 … RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.09.2017 PASSED IN OS.NO.10222/2014 ON THE FILE OF XLI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND MANDATORY INJUNCTION.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo dated 06.07.2021 seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
The memo is placed on record. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
hkh.
N.B.Kantharaju S/o Basappa
B.Sadashivaiah
Nolamba Veerashaiva Sangha
M.I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
